<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Tip: Easily Select object pixels on a layer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paperflame.com/content/web-design/photoshop-tip-easily-select-object-pixels-on-a-layer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paperflame.com/content/web-design/photoshop-tip-easily-select-object-pixels-on-a-layer</link>
	<description>Graphic Design Blog : Design Tutorials - Tips - Truths</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 01:30:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://paperflame.com/content/web-design/photoshop-tip-easily-select-object-pixels-on-a-layer/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperflame.com/content/?p=426#comment-76</guid>
		<description>You have to [Ctrl]+click inside the &quot;Layer Thumbnail&quot; to make this work.  If you [Ctrl]+click outside the thumbnail, it will let you highlight multiple layers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to [Ctrl]+click inside the &#8220;Layer Thumbnail&#8221; to make this work.  If you [Ctrl]+click outside the thumbnail, it will let you highlight multiple layers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://paperflame.com/content/web-design/photoshop-tip-easily-select-object-pixels-on-a-layer/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperflame.com/content/?p=426#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Nice!!! Thanks... that&#039;s exactly what I was looking for!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!!! Thanks&#8230; that&#8217;s exactly what I was looking for!! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://paperflame.com/content/web-design/photoshop-tip-easily-select-object-pixels-on-a-layer/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperflame.com/content/?p=426#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.. Have you tried it? It does work perfectly on transparent layers as I say. The only time it may seem a bit off is if you are trying to select gradients. It will only select with about a 50% tolerance. But all you have to do is do as I say in the post, then use &quot;refine edge&quot; and move the Contract/Expand slider to +100%. Solid objects will be completey selected even if there are multiple objects on the same transparent layer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. Have you tried it? It does work perfectly on transparent layers as I say. The only time it may seem a bit off is if you are trying to select gradients. It will only select with about a 50% tolerance. But all you have to do is do as I say in the post, then use &#8220;refine edge&#8221; and move the Contract/Expand slider to +100%. Solid objects will be completey selected even if there are multiple objects on the same transparent layer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenifer Paris</title>
		<link>http://paperflame.com/content/web-design/photoshop-tip-easily-select-object-pixels-on-a-layer/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenifer Paris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paperflame.com/content/?p=426#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I dont think this post is completely true. Howerver, it has a lot of good ideas. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think this post is completely true. Howerver, it has a lot of good ideas. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
